Sunday, 3 November 2013

Team Project: Proposal writing

We had to come up with a proposal regarding a particular issue in Singapore which we were concerned about. After creating the proposal, we had to present it to the class too. We were divided into teams of two to three by drawing lots. My group members were Edmund Yap and Yip Kin Wai, and our chosen topic was about safety of cyclists on the road.

I have had the pleasure of working with Kin Wai before for another presentation. Thus I kind of ‘knew’ him. However, I had not worked with Edmund before. As such, I did not really ‘know’ him. But after working with him for a few weeks, I understood him better and the three of us became good friends although there were some misunderstandings along the way between the three of us. These misunderstandings we not because of our character differences, but rather due to the lack of understanding about what we really wanted for our project.

We were given the opportunity to choose the issue with which we were concerned with. Automatically, each of us suggested ideas which were very interesting to us. The only problem was that each idea that each of us suggested, did not interest the other members of the group. We decided that we would think about other ideas and relay them to each other before our next class. But due to our busy schedules, all three of us did not think of better ideas to suggest. So, as time was running out, we came to an agreement that our topic would be about road cyclists. Although we all agreed on that topic, none of us were actually passionate about that topic. Since none of us were really passionate about that topic, during our initial research stages, we procrastinated a lot. This lead to our work being backlogged. Because of the backlog of work that we had, we eventually had to rush through a lot of things which caused us to be a little frustrated which also created some misunderstandings between the three of us. But nonetheless, we managed to press on and complete the assignment with anyone getting injured.

To me the root of the problem was that none of us could agree on a single issue. I can understand that, as the three of us were very different people and had very different interests. I feel that we made a wrong choice by arbitrarily choosing a topic just so that all of us could agree on it. I feel that it would have been much better if each of us could somehow take the time to really show how much passion we had for our own topics, which could probably have interested the other members of the group too.  This would have been a better alternative rather than the path we chose. What do you guys think?

7 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "I feel that we made a wrong choice by arbitrarily choosing a topic just so that all of us could agree on it. I feel that it would have been much better if each of us could somehow take the time to really show how much passion we had for our own topics, which could probably have interested the other members of the group too."- an important takeaway for team assignments if you can choose the topic- but how would you handle one where you don't have a choice?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe we must some how create a 'genuine' interest for the subject. Haha I don't know actually. But looking back at our project, even though I did not have must interest for it at the beginning, I must say that, at the end of it, I was actually quite interested in it. I guess this happened partly due to Edmund's and Kin Wai's contribution to the project. To me, they gave this project 'another dimension' from the only one that I was able to see. Maybe that is what created a 'genuine' interest after all.

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Elisha,
    It's been great working with you.

    As much as i agree that the topic that we finally decides on may not be the best one that interest all of us but i must say that the amount of time we spent on decideing a topic is already quite significant. If we would to continue to spend more time to discover our "passionate" topic, we will really be lacking way back and may not be able to accomplish what we have accomplish currently on the cyclist topic.

    Yes i agree that the time management is one part we could work now, perhaps we should be more focus and orientated from the very beginning so as not to waste unnecessary time.

    Don't you start to develop more passion about the cyclist issue after working on it?

    Anyway let's conquer the last hurdle which is our presentation with a BAM!
    Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Elisha and Edmund,

      I would also like to say that it's been a pleasure working with you.

      I somewhat agree with what Elisha said about choosing a topic that at least one of us is passionate about. We would perhaps have had a bit more motivation in working on the project. But I also feel that sometimes things would not work your way even if such a topic was chosen, especially if we couldn't persuade each other to adopt such topics in the first place. Also, if the topic couldn't be chosen, we would have no choice but to accept the topic anyway. Ultimately, one should be putting in effort whether or not one feels passionate about the topic.

      In any case, I think we have done a good job so far so let's keep it up!

      Delete
    2. Dear 2 of the 3 Supermen, it was great to work with you guys. And in my reply to Dr Radhika, 'But looking back at our project, even though I did not have must interest for it at the beginning, I must say that, at the end of it, I was actually quite interested in it. I guess this happened partly due to Edmund's and Kin Wai's contribution to the project. To me, they gave this project 'another dimension' from the only one that I was able to see. Maybe that is what created a 'genuine' interest after all.' This is really how i feel. So once again thank you all for everything.

      Delete